Curiously, there isn't an injured child to be found in this picture of the Manchester bombing. At this point, with what we've seen so far, I would say the following is most likely what occurred:1. A drill was taking place in part of the foyer at Manchester Arena.
2. A training drill for this event took place in Manchester last year.
3. The doors from the arena to that part of the foyer were shut. Likewise, doors from the foyer to the outside were shut and inaccessible from the outside.
4. An explosive sound was played over the loudspeaker at the concert. A similar trick was used at the soccer stadium in Paris during the Bataclan attacks. A second "explosion" took place outside in a controlled environment such that those in the area could hear it and feel the vibrations.
5. People inside the arena were confused as to whether the sounds were a microphone dropping or balloons popping. Some even thought it was a joke. This is because the noise came over the loud speaker. You wouldn't be mistaken if a large bomb detonated near you and confuse the sound. Further, the concert was over so the loud speakers were open for use at that time.
6. Once again we see the use of kids in propaganda such as this. The kids in the arena, none of which were hurt, will be paraded around for the upcoming UK election as victims of an ISIS terrorist attack.
7. Pitiful crisis actors were once again used and told conflicting tales.
8. As expected, we see zero exploded bodies and zero blown off limbs. Further, the only person I have heard that reported blown off limbs was a homeless man who was likely paid a small sum for his "girl with two blown off legs story". Note that there are no blown off legs or little girls in this picture.
9. The above picture reminds me of the one still picture we saw to prove there were dead within the Bataclan theatre.
10. Cell phone video is almost entirely absent, which is unbelievable in an arena with several thousand teenage girls.

Image may contain: one or more people and indoor

Following yesterday’s tragedy in Manchester, the term “false flag” is the hot new meme.
A scandal has developed in the UK as Labour Party activist Debbie Hicks is being shouted down by the Establishment for pointing out that Theresa May will hugely benefit from the 22-22-22 Manchester spectacle. As the Daily Mail reported:

The Daily Mail informs us:

Miss Hicks, who last year stood for Labour in the local elections in her hometown of Stroud in Gloucestershire, wrote: ‘What has happened in Manchester is awful and my thoughts are with the families.
‘However I cant help thinking this is wonderful timing for Theresa May.
‘It is well known that politicians use events as part of their campaigns or messages.’
And it wasn’t just Debbie Hicks suggesting the 22/22/22 Manchester event was a false flag. The Mail reported “a slew” of Twitter comments all agreeing that this looks like a false flag. One was from X-factor star Steve Brookstein.

Even CNN is calling this a likely false flag! And get this – Infowars is OUTRAGED! Has the world turned upside down?
When a suspected false flag raises its ugly head, the first question is always: Who benefits?
The upcoming British election, scheduled for Thursday, June 8, pits Establishment front-woman Theresa May against insurgent Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Corbyn, a supporter of the 9/11 truth movement, was a close friend of former Environment Minister Michael Meacher, who died mysteriously shortly after agreeing to push for an independent British investigation of 9/11.
As I wrote shortly after Meacher’s death:

Meacher suddenly dropped dead “after quite a short illness.” He had been in perfect health, and was mounting a low-key campaign to open an official inquest into 9/11 on behalf of British victims’ family members. Meacher’s death is just one of many – most notably that of WTC-7 demolition witness Barry Jennings – that were all-too-convenient for the forces behind the 9/11 cover-up.
The British Establishment (led by the City of London banksters) will stop at nothing to make sure that 9/11 truth supporter Jeremy Corbyn – who is also a threat to expose the elite pedophile network – loses to May. And the obvious way to do that would be to stage a huge false flag to make the sheeple “rally ’round the Union Jack” behind their current leader, Theresa May.

VT editor Ian Greenhalgh points out that “it is very significant they chose to attack young people, as Corbyn’s support is by far the strongest amongst the young.” The strategic political choice to attack young people is reminiscent of the 11/13/15 attack on Paris’s Bataclan theater. That attack, many analysts have suggested, was designed to curtail the surge of support for Palestine among the French jeunesse.
Ian continues: “I’ve been to concerts in that venue, you can’t get in without being searched and that goes back as far as seeing ACDC there in 1994. They have bars inside where they sell alcohol, so they search everyone for bottles, cans etc. There is always a big pile of confiscated bottles by the door. So if they weren’t searching people, I bet it wasn’t the usual security people. That in itself smells of op”
Corbyn, like martyred American president JFK, is a sworn enemy of Israel’s nuclear program. He is pushing for “a political process to decommission Israel’s nuclear arsenal.”
Additionally, the bombing happened as Trump was leaving Saudi Arabia and heading for Occupied Jerusalem. The event reinforces the “Evil Holy War Against Radical Islamic Terrorists” theme of Trump’s mendacious Mideast tour.

Was Manchester a false flag? The recurrence of the numeral 22 – 22 victims, a 22-year-old perp, on May 22 – is a dead giveaway.
The freemasonic cabal responsible for false flag events often “signs” their work by prominently featuring the number 11 or its multiples. 9/11/01 and 11/22/63 are prominent examples. For details, see my articles:
11 examples of Illuminati numerology
“77 dead on 7/14” – numerology signals false flag
3/22 False Flag! Gladio Strikes Brussels on Satanic Holiday
Another London False Flag (dated March 22)
There were also the usual “terror drills” ahead of the live event.

The perpetrator, as always, was “well known to the authorities.” As always, Rita Kaatz of the Israeli Mossad spin-off SITE claimed responsibility on behalf of her #1 client, ISIS. And as always, the perp/patsy was kind enough to bring along an ID card and make sure it would quickly be found.

In short, all of the preliminary indications suggest that we are looking at yet another false flag, along the lines of those analyzed in my edited False Flag Trilogy.

Are “Islamic terror” events false flags? Find out! Read the False Flag Trilogy: We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, ANOTHER French False Flag, and Orlando False Flag
Additionally, one of the most important contributors to my False Flag Trilogy, Ole Dammegard, recently predicted an upcoming Manchester attack on my radio show. Ole points out that yesterday’s Manchester attack occurred on the fourth anniversary of the fake beheading of Lee Rigby in Woolwich. He also notes the false flaggers’ odd penchant for staging their spectacles on the 22nd of the month:

Lee Rigby – 22-05-2013
Brussels attack – 22-03-16
Munich attack – 22-07-16
London attack- 22-03-17
Manchester attack- 22-05-17
Norway attack- 22-07-11
As always, Wikipedia appeared with the signed-sealed-and-delivered version of the official story almost instantly.
Will the Manchester (suspected) false flag destroy the candidacy of another left-leaning insurgent, Jeremy Corbyn, the way the pre-election French false flags stymied Melenchon’s surge? Or will British voters prove themselves more sophisticated than their French counterparts, and send Theresa May and her false-flagging entourage down to a well-deserved defeat?
Stay tuned for updates!
– – –
*Ian Greenhalgh was right. Apparently there was a security stand-down, people were not being patted down at the entrance, as reported by this witness. This fits the common pattern: Charlie Hebdo magazine’s security protection was downgraded shortly before that attack, as noted by Maryse Wolinski, widow of slain cartoonist Georges Wolinski in
The Guardian: “As far as I’m concerned, there’s a kind of double violence. There’s the violence of the attack, and then there’s a second violence in the denial of police failings. How was this attack possible? I’m still asking myself that question. The police protection of the offices had been scaled down, despite the French parliament and police saying an attack on French soil was imminent.” Other cases of “downgrading security before a big false flag” include: Sending the head of JFK’s military security detail to the South Pole ahead of the assassination as recounted by Fletcher Prouty; sending fighter jets to the North Pole as part of an exercise on 9/11/01; jamming NYC police and fire radios on 9/11; causing CCTV cameras to mysteriously fail in London on 7/7/2005 and again for the recent March 22 Westminster attack; jamming security communications for the Paris 11/13/15 attack; and so on. When they forget to take down the CCTV cameras, as apparently happened for the Nice truck attack last summer, we get to watch the government insist that all CCTV evidence be destroyed unseen.
*Electric_Socket (on Reddit) notes that the Manchester terror exercises bore uncanny similarities to the live event: “Also in May. Also suicide bomber. Also a small scale homemade bomb. Demo bomb also goes off in the entry/lobby area. Not too deep.”
* According to The Telegraph: “Photographs of bomb remnants found at the Manchester Arena show a trigger switch with a tiny circuit board soldered into the end, which experts say could point to a remote-control or timer built into the bomb to ensure an accomplice could detonate it if Abedi lost his nerve.” The “lost his nerve” bit is highly dubious and speculative. Almost certainly this WAS NOT A SUICIDE BOMB. Instead, the patsy set up to be an involuntary “suicide bomber” would be paid to carry a “package” that would be blown up by a timer or more likely by remote control without the patsy’s knowledge. This was standard operating procedure in Iraq during the US Occupation. Occupation forces would pay locals to drive vehicles to and through targeted locations, the vehicles would be blown up by remote control, and the carnage blamed on a “suicide bomber.” This is how the “Sunni vs. Shia” civil war was fabricated, with Occupation forces blowing up Shia sites and blaming Sunnis and vice versa.

Post a Comment