A new WikiLeaks release now claims that ISIS and al-Qaeda were essentially created by the American government long before Barack Obama took office.
That doesn’t mean that Barack Obama had nothing to do with the rise of terror across the globe. While George W’ Bush’s decision to expand the War on Terror to Iraq will be argued for decades, Obama’s handling of the war will not. His policies unquestionably left the world a more dangerous place. His sudden withdrawal from Iraq left a power vacuum that was later taken advantage of by ISIS — but ISIS existed long before Obama took office.

500K Wikileaks Release: CIA Effectively Created ISIS Through Joint Venture with Saudi Arabia 
According to the documents released by WikiLeaks, “year zero” of the terrorist organization was in 1979, during the Carter administration. It was when that the CIA forged a deal with a foreign government that led to the proliferation of ISIS.

Six years ago, WikiLeaks landmark “Cablegate” release shed light on the previously-unseen dealings of the American government. Now, they’re releasing more information in a series called the “Carter Cables.”

The founder of the transparency organization WikiLeaks released a statement yesterday upon the release of over 500,000 diplomatic cables dating back to 1979, which succinctly reveals how the CIA was essentially responsible for creating the Islamic State (ISIS) terror group.
The timing of the release coincided with the sixth anniversary of WikiLeaks “Cablegate” release, which exposed the machinations of the underbelly of the U.S. empire. The latest release, known as the “Carter Cables,” adds 531,525 new diplomatic cables to the WikiLeaks’ already voluminous Public Library of U.S. Diplomacy (PLUSD).
In a statement released in concert with the release of the “Carter Cables,” Julian Assange mapped out how the events of 1979 began a series of events that have ultimately culminated in the rise of ISIS.
“If any year could be said to be the “year zero” of our modern era, 1979 is it,” said Assange.
Assange lays bare the reality that the roots of modern Islamist terrorism began through a joint venture by the CIA and Saudi Arabian government, to the tune of billions of dollars, to create a “Mujahideen” force to fight against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan – which ultimately led to the creation of al-Qaeda.
That wasn’t the destabilizing event that occurred in 1979. WikiLeaks provided a timetable of many of the most consequential developments during the tumultuous year.

The 1979 current of Islamification spread to Pakistan where the US embassy was burned to the ground and Pakistan Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was executed.
The Iranian hostage crisis would go on to fatally undermine Jimmy Carter’s presidency and see the election of Ronald Reagan.
Saddam Hussein? Took power in 1979.
The rise of al-Qaeda eventually bore the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, enabling the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and over a decade of war, leaving, at its end, the ideological, financial and geographic basis for ISIS.

The Iranian revolution and Saddam Hussein’s rise to power and the subsequent Iran-Iraq War would connect with the 1979 Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua to produce the Iran-Contra affair and the indictment of 12 US administration officials including Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.
Elsewhere, Thatcher won in the UK, Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, Idi Amin fled Uganda and the ANC made the decision to militarily resist Apartheid.
In the United States, the Three Mile Island nuclear incident led to a turning away from the construction and development of new nuclear reactors, increasing the reliance on oil and coal for decades.
While the 1979 SALT II agreements made some progress in reducing the risk of nuclear war, nuclear preparations and testing were stepped up elsewhere. The US decided to place Pershing and Cruise missiles in Europe and a South African/Israeli nuclear test was detected by US early warning satellites.
China officially came in from the cold and Deng Xiaoping visited the United States in a defining strategic re-orientation by both states.

Post a Comment